Mike
Bennett: October, 2005
The Michael Carpenter
Interview, Part 2
In part one of my interview with Michael
Carpenter in the last issue of Fufkin, I focused on his swell
new project with Hitchcock's Regret singer Mark Moldre, The
Supahip. Their debut platter Seize the World (Not Lame)
is a wonderfully relaxed pop-rock album that Michael's fans
should enjoy and, I hope, may win him some new fans. In part
two of this interview, I opened things up to ask Michael about
the music business and the current climate for music, what
he's listening to, the current status of his solo career and
his songwriting. As with part one, Michael's intelligence
and honesty shine through. This interview starts off with
a question about one of my favorite tracks on The Supahip
album, "Radio", a punchy rant about the medium we
loved as kids and now love to complain about:
Fufkin: One track that stands out, both because
of it's sharp musical approach and it's lyrics, is "Radio".
Michael, I think you are one of the most articulate musicians
out there when it comes to talking about the struggles of
making it as an indie musician. Was this an idea bouncing
in your head for a while, or did something instantly inspire
you?
Michael (MC): As a producer, it seems like
I talk about the state of radio and the lack of opportunities
available to independent artists every day. I've studied,
and been victim to, the way radio works and have been constantly
dumbstruck by the power of radio still, and the difficulty
certain types of music have in finding a place to be played,
specifically independent pop. It seems like this music has
no home...too pop for indie radio, but too indie for the mainstream
stations it deserves to be on, but will never find itself.
I've seen the impact a little radio play can make to a project...it
can be the difference between selling 50 copies and 5000 copies,
and in the independent music game, that the difference between
giving up music or making another record.
So I guess the ideas presented by the track
'The Radio' had been floating about in my head for some time.
I wrote the song one night while my baby daughter was unsettled...it
just seemed to pop into my head almost fully formed as the
one chord rant that it is. The idea of course being that radio
only has its sizeable power and influence as long as people
keep listening, and while radio may think it's all powerful,
at any time a consumer can silence radio just by hitting the
off switch...something I seem to have done a long time ago.
Maybe that's why radio won't play me?
Fufkin: Of course, radio is not alone anymore
-- we now have more than the radio thanks to the Internet,
file sharing, downloading, etc. There are many different opinions
on whether this added access is positive or negative (I think
it's some of both) - how do you feel about these developments?
MC: There's no doubt in mind that we're right
in the middle of a revolution to the way music is perceived,
purchased and listened to. People's expectations of music
delivery are changing, and with that their perception of what
their music is is being modified. With the onset of the iPod
and 'shuffle,' albums are becoming less important, which is
a definite swing back from when the CD hit and singles seemed
to quickly disappear. I remember buying singles...chasing
down that one song I heard on the radio and not really being
too fussed about albums unless three or four singles were
great. We seem to be heading more towards that with online
download stores. Where we're at now is interesting...there
seems to be lots of dedicated music listeners who are exploring
new options with listening to music. But the average person
seems to be still locked into traditional radio and television.
Personal listening devices, like iPods,
are interesting because technically you can go find some music
and have it on your player instantly. I feel that eventually,
record stores will be much more like boutiques, as people
embrace the ability to download songs, or albums, with artwork
onto their personal listening device. That's not fairy tale
land any more...it's happening. And I feel like a lot of labels
have been EXTREMELY slow in picking up on this. Instead of
spending millions suing Napster and the like, why hasn't Sony
got an international store right on their site? The advent
of mp3s isn't new...I was aware of them five or six years
ago, and yet most majors still don't seem to be as wise to
this as they should be. I look at things like iTunes (which
we don't have in Australia yet) and Emusic, and it seems so
ridiculously simple. To me it's like being able to stroll
through the ultimate record store. Undoubtedly that's where
we're headed. I could go on about this all day...I think about
it a lot...anybody who is trying to sell their music should
be.
But finally, to answer your question...radio
is still radio... t has a reach and an influence way beyond
any other sort of promotion you can do, because every one
has a radio in their car, and a lot of people drive their
cars to work, etc. So basically, if you can't get on radio
here, which is virtually impossible for independent artists
in Australia, you're not ever going to sell more than a few
hundred records. That becomes worse when programmers, who
have an enormous amount of music to wade through, start to
put certain criteria on artists...like they're more likely
to play your music if you're out there doing four shows a
week touring around the country. While I understand this to
a degree, for a 38 year old who has been doing those sorts
of shows for over 20 years, and has a young family, that's
not gonna happen. That therefore makes perfectly valid projects
like The Supahip almost impossible to promote.
Fufkin: Do you think that radio will respond
to downloading and the iPod, etc., or that satellite radio
is the more logical response? Are they pushing satellite radio
in Australia like they are in the States?
MC: No, they're not. I'm not as up to date
with radio things...I gave up on radio many years ago to be
honest, so I guess it serves me right that radio won't give
me a shot! But from what I read about the U.S., having more
options is most definitely a positive things for artists.
Anything that gives you a wider reach can only be a good thing.
I believe, perhaps misguidedly, that if people can hear it
and like it they'll find a way to get it. As a small record
label now, and looking at sales figures, I may be wrong about
that!
Fufkin: What about the live music scene -
from your view how is it in Australia?
MC: I believe it's as healthy as it's been
for a long time. There was a period there at the end of the
last decade when a lot of venues were closing down. But there's
no doubt that the 'new rock' has injected interest again in
guitar bands playing in bars...it's quite a thrill to go out
and see people at shows again, and bands with a better sense
of dynamics in general. The shoe-gazing/feedback thing was
getting kinda old. Unfortunately though, and I see this from
all angles...as an artist and a producer, it is very much
a young man's game, and you don't find a lot of married folks
in their 30's at these shows. So it's hard for people in their
early 20's to relate to a bunch of late 30's people on stage,
no matter how great or accomplished they are. And that's not
me being overly sensitive to age...that's exactly what I see,
and exactly what these kids in their early 20's tell me to
my face. But that's okay too...it's just a changing of the
guard, and that doesn't upset me...you can't change getting
old.
Fufkin: I know there are times that artists
such as yourself can get discouraged. For example, Doug Powell
has decided to call it quits. How often do you think that
you should just pack it in, and how do you get out of that
mindset?
MC: This is an important question for sure.
Making it in any shape or form in this industry is about the
most difficult thing you can imagine. What other career choice
has about a 97% failure rate? I'm one of only about four people
I know in the music world who are doing this full time, and
to be honest, it's only my work as a producer that keeps me
alive. My own projects have consistently cost me more than
they make, and recently I did a tally up of how much I've
spent on my 'solo career' and it was a deposit on a house.
When you're younger you can take those risks, but my debut
album came out when I was single and 32, and now I'm older
and have a young family. I can't really get out there and
tour around the place anymore... it's too expensive and I
just can't afford it, no matter how much I love coming and
playing.
When Doug made his announcement that he
was quitting, I was on the verge of doing the same...at least
quitting the solo artist thing. I've achieved a lot...I've
done a lot of albums in a short space of time, and I still
have a few more things up my sleeve that will take me through
to the end of next year. But so far I've struggled to get
people interested in The Supahip project, despite it being
one of my favourite things I've done, and I struggled to get
people interested in the *Rolling Ball* album. I have a nice
little fanbase, but I think they're getting older and I worry
that because I've released a lot in a reasonably short space
of time that they may be a bit spent on me.
So with all that in mind, you have to ask
yourself 'why am I doing this?' Of course, the answer is because
I want and need to, as a creative person...it fulfills me
to a degree like nothing else does. But there's certainly
a diminishing returns aspect to it, and that makes it harder
and harder to get up for every new project...believing that
it could be the one that strikes a chord with people and sells
a few more than the last one.
On top of that, there's the creative aspect.
After Rolling Ball, I felt like I'd said most things
I wanted to say. The Supahip outlet was a different sort of
outlet...I was co-writing and throwing things together quickly.
But I've barely written a song now for a year, and the thought
of getting an album's worth of material together when I don't
have much to write about is a little daunting. Plus, the Rolling
Ball album was logistically a difficult album to make...I've
gotten a lot busier as a producer and I was doing it in little
dribs and drabs, and to be honest, I don't wanna make records
like that anymore. But I literally can't afford to block book
myself for a month to do my own record, especially when I'll
struggle to sell that many of them. I guess the moral of the
story is that I don't wanna be one of those artists who just
records an album because he feels he has to, and it sucks.
I have a nice solid body of work, and I never want to release
a sub-par album in any way. And right now I just don't know
if there is another originals album in my immediate future,
for all the reasons I've mentioned. Guess we'll see.
Fufkin: With your standards, could you ever
see yourself, 20 years down the road, just putting out CD-Rs
(or whatever format is going down at that time) recorded in
your living room?
MC: Absolutely...I don't think I'll ever
really stop, but right now I don't have the time. If I win
the lotto tomorrow though, expect three albums in the next
12 months!
Fufkin: I don't see you as having ever shied
away from the power pop banner -- do you see the term as a
blessing or a curse?
MC: I'm proud of being classified a power-pop
artist, although I personally don't really think of myself
that way...my music is not how I perceive power-pop to be,
but that's okay. I've been a long time supporter of the genre
of power-pop...quite vocally at times. And after my careful
research, there's no doubt it's a curse. I'm mystified by
why music that is so timeless, accessible and appealing can
be so unpopular and unfashionable for so long. A few years
ago when I was doing the Lost Weekend Pop Festivals here in
Australia, my aim was to push power pop into the front of
the independent music world. What I found was that people
just didn't want to know. I still believe that the two compilation
CDs we put out for the festivals are about the best two power
pop CDs you can buy, and I have an unswayable faith in the
genre, even though I don't listen to it as much as I used
to. Like so many, I believe it will rise again, but I'm not
sure when, and I don't think I'm the guy that can make it
happen. I tried and it didn't work out for me, I'm afraid...
Fufkin: In terms of current music, what is
hitting you now? What about bands you're working with or seeing
in your homeland?
MC: Well...I thought the novelty of 'shuffle'
on my iPod would have worn out by now, but I've been enjoying
just whatever pops up on my iPod when I have recreational
listening time. It's been quite a trip down memory lane, and
I've been enjoying that very much...it's been very recreational.
Most of what I listen to apart from that is the stuff I've
been producing...rough mixes, or finished mixes, or mastered
versions, just to make sure it all sounds good in the car.
We've had a great year in the studio this
year...lots of great artists and whole variety of projects
produced. We've done a couple of straight country things,
a few straight rock things, and quite a few 'Aimee Mann/Jon
Brion-esque' pop things...our favourite things to do, and
we're getting quite a name for ourselves for doing that sorta
stuff. So there are lots of good things that should come out
during 2006. In terms of popular things here, unfortunately
Australia is going through a bit of a depression musically.
We've hardly had any new artists come through in the last
few years who are real career artists...people you'll know
will be around in ten years. Our charts seem to follow the
U.S. charts more now than ever, so R & B/Hip Hop, etc.
are favourites, with the odd rock thing. But certainly not
a lot to make Australia stand out from anywhere else...which
is frustrating. Our major labels seem to be a bit clueless
at the moment. There seems to be a lot of great music out
there, but people just seem to be struggling to be heard.
It seems it's harder now than ever.
Fufkin: What about new discoveries from the
past? Or anything familiar that has suddenly struck you in
a different way?
MC: So many things seem to be coming back
to haunt me. My love of The Band never goes away, but I'm
into them deeper than I've been for a while. They seem to
be one of those bands where every year I have a month or so
where I love just diving into their music. I've been surprised
at how bands like Supertramp, or Free or Queen for example
will pop up and I realise that at one point I owned most of
thier records and really loved them.
That always surprises me...how much music
I must have soaked in when I was younger. And after not hearing
a certain thing for a while, it feels wonderful to dive back
into it. It seems anything post about 1984 though doesn't
have the same reaction...a lot of records after that don't
have as much impact as they once did. I think I started hearing
music differently once I was in the middle of playing and
recording it.
Fufkin: Now onto your solo records - what's
on tap?
Fufkin: As I said before, I have a few things
that I've had planned for a while. I have one more song to
do for the next version of my SOOP (songs of other people)
series. I've been working on this album in dribs and drabs
since about 2002...whenever I have a day free I just record
a song. This time I've decided to do versions of some of my
favourite songs from my contemporaries. Once upon a time it
was okay to cover other songs not long after they were released.
Nowadays it's frowned upon. But since I've been exposed to
the greater world of independent pop music, I've heard so
many fantastic songs. I thinkIi could do a box set of versions
of songs I love by my contemporaries. So this album will have
versions of songs by Chris von Sneidern, Butterfly 9, Blue
Cartoon, Bobby Sutliff, Cloud 11, Carl Hemmings, The General
Store and The Andersons, just to name a few. My only criteria
is that nothing on there was ever major label. The only other
thing is that this will be probably the only time where I'll
release an album where EVERY sound on it was created by me...no
special guests at all. It's been fun to do it...I wish I had
more opportunity to do it. So that should be out in the first
quarter next year.
The next project after that will be my Oarfins
album. It will collect all of the numerous tribute/compilation/extra/unreleased
tracks in one place. It'll be a good collection that may put
a nice full stop on things for a while...it'll go back over
10 years of me recording and tie up a lot of loose ends. I'm
really proud of my contributions to tribute albums over the
years, so it's a good listen to have them all on one CD. That
should come out later next year.
After that, who knows. By then it'll 2007
and it'll be 3 years since Rolling Ball. I may be ready
for another original album...I may be recharged enough by
then. Or I may decide that's a good place to stop for a while
until I feel it's valid. Or I may just decide to record more
versions of other people's songs...that's always a fun thing
to do, and there are so many great songs out there that people
aren't aware of. In the meantime there'll more than likely
be another Supahip record... Mark and I are enjoying it a
lot, and we're going to get together later in the year to
see where we'll decide to go next with the Supahip.
Fufkin: Has your writing process changed
over the years? Is it easier or harder for you now?
MC: I've never really found writing particularly
difficult...when I need to write songs, or I have an opportunity
or time set aside to write songs, they seem to appear...sometimes
with some gentle prodding, but often quite easily. Not all
of them are good.. I usually give up on the sucky ones pretty
quickly, although I never throw anything away...there were
two songs on the Supahip album where my contribution was just
little bits I had lying around! But generally I can find something
reasonably quickly.
Even now when I haven't written in a while,
I don't feel like the well is dry at all. Hopefully at the
end of the year when I have some holiday time, I can set aside
a day and see if I feel I have anything to say. I am getting
a feeling that if I was going to do another record, I'd like
to try to make a very pop record...I feel that I've always
tried to cover a lot of bases on my albums, but I like the
idea of writing straighter pop songs...lots of jangly guitars.
But that may change tomorrow when I listen to The Band again
and I'll feel I wanna get all 'rootsy'...
Fufkin: One thing about your music, to me,
is that the joy and passion you feel for life is always evident.
Even on darker or more maudlin tracks, there's never a sense
of resignation. For example, on a song like "Good Enough",
where the protagonist is in desperate straits, your empathy
for her gives the song a sense of hope. Is this just something
I'm picking up, or is that something that you try to put across?
MC: I think whether we like it or not, our
personality gets reflected in our expression, in my case music.
Personally, I'm a very.. .well, I wouldn't say optimistic,
because I can be quite dire at times, but I always have hope.
I believe in people being able to lift themselves out of whatever
ails them if they want to. Of course, I know that's not always
something people can control, but I really do believe that
people can change their bad situations somewhat if they're
brave and determined enough. So with that in mind I guess
I can't help but angle my writing that way. In "Good
Enough", for her she would feel fulfilled if her man
appreciated her just a little more. While we can argue that
it's a hollow and frail sort of happiness, everyone has their
own yardsticks! So while I'm not consciously looking for a
happy ending with every song I write, I am aware of this thing
in me that's keen to project a more hopeful stance. It seems
more useful than the other alternative...
Fufkin: Very well put. Speaking of your lyrics
- I think that you continue to grow as a lyricist, and you're
doing it the hard way - not through word play or cleverness,
but direct, to-the-bone sentiments. How well do you feel your
getting your ideas and concepts across? Is there anything
that you're trying to say that you haven't been able to express
yet?
MC: For anyone that knows me, they know I
talk a lot, and I talk quite frankly. I always have and despite
it annoying people at times, I can't change that aspect of
me. And while I'd love the ability to write clever wordplay,
like a Neil Finn or an Aimee Mann, I just don't do it very
well. When I try, I feel like what I'm trying to say gets
clouded, and there are a few dubious attempts in my catalogue.
But in general, I'm at peace with my honest and direct style
of writing. Some people I know think it's a bit too honest.
Some people just think it's corny or I'm showing too much.
But like I said, that's how I am. That's no different to how
I communicate with people if I was sitting across from them.
With that in mind, I can go back to what
I was saying about having not much to say at the moment...I
feel like you can listen to the four original albums I've
done and the Supahip album and you're going to get a pretty
good idea of what I am, and what is important to me. I'm VERY
proud of some of the things I've expressed on these records,
but I desperately want to avoid sounding like a broken record.
I want to avoid people thinking "here's another Michael
Carpenter album with five songs of devotion, a song to his
kid and a few third person observations about something he
can relate to."
I think that was the thing that was most
pleasing about The Supahip album...the nature of it allowed
me to express a difficult time I was going through and I was
extremely happy with the lyrical content and economy of my
songs on that album. Certainly, it's very pleasing when people
e-mail me to say that they have used something like "The
One For Me" off Kingsrdworks as a wedding song.
I can't speak for everyone, but I know it describes my life
with my wife from my point of view very well. That other people
relate to anything I've written is immensely pleasing. While
I don't do this for the adulation (though a little is nice)
it's a nice thing when people listen and understand. By keeping
it simple I guess I'm just making it easier for that to happen.
___________________________________________________________
To
reach any other page contained in this month's update on Fufkin.com,
read the home page for the appropriate link and click on it.
You can also search the site from any page using the search
box located at the top of each page. Merely type in the word,
phrase, name of the band, recording, name of the Fufkin writer
that you are looking for or Whatever in the search box, and
then click on "Search". If you would like to e-mail
us, go to the About Us page for a list of e-mail addresses.
Go
back to the home page by clicking
here
________________________________________________________________
|